What are your thoughts on this subdivision? Would you like Dalron to allocate the 5% parkland designation to the southern most area keeping the walking trail and a greenspacing buffer for some of the ecology?
How do you feel about the way subdivisions are designed and what are your thoughts on building subdivisions over existing community greenspaces that serve the community?
Do think that Greater Sudbury Planning should mandate a better community design with more allocation for walkable natural areas and accessible greenspacing to serve the interests of community health and well-being?
All your comments and feedback can be directed directly at Sudbury Planning Division
You can contact Wendy Kaufman, Senior Planner, Planning Services
at 705-674-4455 ext 4318
or by email at
[email protected]
Wendy is the information point person on the Dalron Nickeldale Development proposal. She is also collecting the community feedback, so all questions, inquiries, reservations and objection can be voiced directly to her, through email.
The clock is ticking on feedback from community in Wendy Kaufman’s report to Council. She is preparing that report for submission soon. Please forward your own feedback to her, by phone and/or email
Please C.C. all correspondence to our collective email address also [email protected]
Direct written appeals can be submitted to:
City of Greater Sudbury,
Alex Singbush,
Manager of Developmental Approvals,
Planning Services Division,
PO Box 5000, Station A,
200 Brady street, Sudbury, ON
P3A 5P3
And please comment your thoughts, anywhere on the re2021.com website:
There’s three ways to give your feedback:
1. Inline Commenting on our open letter to Planning Services
(any of those little green inline comment boxes
will open up a place for a comment in a particular section of the community letter)
2. Any commenting or reply to existing comments at the bottom of any posted article.
or
3. Just send your them to our community email at [email protected] and we will find the right place for them on site.
(*note* your email will not be shared or shown publicly).
But if you don’t want your name shared, but you want to get something across, just let us know.
So please send anything you want to share. Your stories, thoughts, comments, photos, videos, are very important to us.
We look forward to hearing from you.
We submitted the following to the Over To You Survey.
https://overtoyou.greatersudbury.ca/phase-2-official-plan-review?link_id=5&can_id=e1a2b413f256bf5cf2dff2f2402c1040&source=email-cls-newsletter-9&email_referrer=email_1552749&email_subject=cls-newsletter
Transportation
When attending the meeting at the Cedar Park Field House on May 4th I was surprised to hear that the 3 options offered all connected directly to Maley. I understood that one of the options was supposed to not connect to Maley. Also, what happened to the 2016 Village of Montrose Master Plan that I understood was approved? It would not be safe to have a street extending from the West end of Forestdale Drive as it is an extremely steep slope. Lastly, there should not be another street cutting across the New Sudbury Historical Trail.
Other
Please preserve the greenspace at the South end of the property which backs onto the homes on the Courts North of Forestdale Drive. This forested area is used extensively by area residents who have developed a network of trails for hiking, biking, snowshoeing, x-country skiing, and walking dogs. I understand that City Council agreed to reduce the carbon footprint in Sudbury. Therefore, why cut down a healthy forest? This greenspace makes it a better place to live. Please preserve the environment.
Comments/Questions
Please make a commitment to preserve this greenspace.
Definitely. There’s a need in this time and age to consider the way land is developed. If City Council and the planning service division can mandate features that will enhance the livability, health, and social wellbeing of the new communities, that would be great.